NanoID, ULID, and Why UUID Isn't Always the Right Default
UUIDs aren't the only reasonable choice for a unique identifier — NanoID and ULID solve slightly different problems. NanoID generates a short, URL-safe random string using a larger alphabet than hex, so it packs more entropy per character than a UUID, letting it stay shorter (commonly 21 characters) while keeping collision probability negligible — useful anywhere a UUID's 36-character length feels wasteful, like a short link slug or a public-facing resource ID.
ULID (Universally Unique Lexicographically sortable Identifier) takes a different approach: it embeds a timestamp in its leading characters, so IDs generated later always sort after IDs generated earlier as plain strings — solving the same database-index-locality problem covered in UUID v7 (see the Complete Guide to UUID), but with ULID's own specific 26-character Crockford Base32 encoding instead of UUID's hyphenated hex format.
Both remain fully random (or time-ordered) identifiers suitable for distributed generation with no central coordinator — the choice between NanoID, ULID, and UUID comes down to which specific property (compactness, sortability, or maximum ecosystem compatibility) matters most for a given use case.